On 16/02/17 00:28, Randy Bush wrote: >> - section 9: What's the background to removing the statement >> that one of TCP-AO ssh etc SHOULD be used? What is the reality >> of deployments here? I assume it is not TCP-AO anyway but does >> TLS or SSH get used? > > TCP-AO never maaterialized. > > off-hand, i can not think of a way to measure who is using what, but i > have this horrible suspicion it's all "it's all inside our domain of > control, so let's just run nekkid."
Yeah that's the concern. If the answer was "seems mostly folks use ssh" (or tls, or ipsec, whatever), I'd have asked if we could get away with at least a SHOULD-use for that. Such encouragement would be good IMO, if it's non-fiction. Cheers, S. > >> - various places: I think 6810 was correct in using "that" and >> not "which" in many places. I realise that's a fairly frequent >> style thing that gets toggled though, but I bet the RFC editor >> sets a load of those back to "that" :-) > > chicago style. the rfced and we amuse ourselves over that one. which > is why rfced gets the big bucks. > > randy >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
