Hi all for your helps
Thanks
Finally, I have carried out my coop analysis with nice results
Thanks

Gregorio

El 01/10/2010 16:32, Nguyen Doan Sau escribió:
That is because my results are quite reasonable when using Angstrom as length unit. I also did it with Borh units. COHP results are almost zero.
Sau Nguyen
U of Houston

--- On *Fri, 1/10/10, Ian Shuttleworth /<[email protected]>/* wrote:


    From: Ian Shuttleworth <[email protected]>
    Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] Re: COOP Utility
    To: [email protected]
    Date: Friday, 1 October, 2010, 9:58

    Why? I checked Marcos' analysis, it seems logical.

    On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Nguyen Doan Sau
    <[email protected] </mc/[email protected]>> wrote:

        Actually, I think it's angstrom
        Sau Nguyen
        U of Houston

        --- On *Fri, 1/10/10, Marcos Veríssimo Alves
        /<[email protected]
        </mc/[email protected]>>/* wrote:


            From: Marcos Veríssimo Alves
            <[email protected]
            </mc/[email protected]>>
            Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] Re: COOP Utility
            To: [email protected] </mc/[email protected]>
            Date: Friday, 1 October, 2010, 7:50


            Good question, it is not explicitly stated in any manual.
            However, I'd guess that one should take that what is said
            in units.f90 is what is actually used:

              ! Define various unit conversion factors from internal
            units.

              ! internally, siesta works with length: Bohr.
              !                               energy: Rydberg.
              !                                 time: femtosecond

            So I'd guess that the lengths should be the internal ones.
            I have just grepped the names of the constants that are
            stated in units, and I see no conversions. IMO this is
            another hint that the units are siesta's internal ones.

            Marcos

            On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Ian Shuttleworth
            <[email protected]
            <http://mc/[email protected]>> wrote:

                Just a quick (I think) related question, to the MPR files:

                What are the units of "bond distance range" (an
                example below) in these files?

                With thanks

                Ian Shuttleworth

                > Ti3d-O2s  # Coop/Cohp for Ti(3d)-O(2s)
                > Ti_3d
                > 2.0 3.0 # Bond distance range in calculating COOP/COHP
                > O_2s
                > Ti3d-O2p # Coop/Cohp for Ti(3d)-O(2p)
                > Ti_3d
                > 2.0 3.0 # Bond distance range in calculating COOP/COHP
                > O_2p
                > The rest of the lines is pretty self-explanatory, I
                guess. Hope this helps.
                > Marcos






-- "Hate to live, don't live to hate"


Responder a