Congratulations!

2010/10/7 Gregorio García Moreno <[email protected]>

>  Hi all for your helps
> Thanks
> Finally, I have carried out my coop analysis with nice results
> Thanks
>
> Gregorio
>
> El 01/10/2010 16:32, Nguyen Doan Sau escribió:
>
>   That is because my results are quite reasonable when using Angstrom as
> length unit. I also did it with Borh units. COHP results are almost zero.
> Sau Nguyen
> U of Houston
>
> --- On *Fri, 1/10/10, Ian Shuttleworth 
> <[email protected]><[email protected]>
> * wrote:
>
>
> From: Ian Shuttleworth 
> <[email protected]><[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] Re: COOP Utility
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Friday, 1 October, 2010, 9:58
>
>  Why? I checked Marcos' analysis, it seems logical.
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Nguyen Doan Sau 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
>   Actually, I think it's angstrom
> Sau Nguyen
> U of Houston
>
> --- On *Fri, 1/10/10, Marcos Veríssimo Alves <
> [email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> >* wrote:
>
>
> From: Marcos Veríssimo Alves 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> >
> Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] Re: COOP Utility
> To: [email protected] <http://mc/[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, 1 October, 2010, 7:50
>
>
> Good question, it is not explicitly stated in any manual. However, I'd
> guess that one should take that what is said in units.f90 is what is
> actually used:
>
>    ! Define various unit conversion factors from internal units.
>
>    ! internally, siesta works with length: Bohr.
>   !                               energy: Rydberg.
>   !                                 time: femtosecond
>
>  So I'd guess that the lengths should be the internal ones. I have just
> grepped the names of the constants that are stated in units, and I see no
> conversions. IMO this is another hint that the units are siesta's internal
> ones.
>
>  Marcos
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Ian Shuttleworth <
> [email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> Just a quick (I think) related question, to the MPR files:
>
> What are the units of "bond distance range" (an example below) in these
> files?
>
> With thanks
>
> Ian Shuttleworth
>
> > Ti3d-O2s  # Coop/Cohp for Ti(3d)-O(2s)
> > Ti_3d
> > 2.0 3.0 # Bond distance range in calculating COOP/COHP
> > O_2s
> > Ti3d-O2p # Coop/Cohp for Ti(3d)-O(2p)
> > Ti_3d
> > 2.0 3.0 # Bond distance range in calculating COOP/COHP
> > O_2p
> > The rest of the lines is pretty self-explanatory, I guess. Hope this
> helps.
> > Marcos
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> "Hate to live, don't live to hate"
>
>
>

Responder a