Hello Leila,

Did you do a spin-polarized calculation of the atom as well? (see attached fdf)

Regards,

Natalia

On 3/1/11, leila <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Natalia,
> Thank you for your reply. I learnt a lot according to your email.
> However, the FixSpin tag didn't really guide me to the proper results. I got
> the binding energy of -7.17 eV, rather than -4.8 eV in your last mail.
> Thank you very much!
> Yours sincerely,
> Leila
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Natalia Martsinovich [mailto:[email protected]]
> 发送时间: 2011年3月1日 2:10
> 收件人: [email protected]
> 主题: Re: [SIESTA-L] H2 binding Energy
>
> Hello Leila,
>
> I see that a spin-polarized calculation with your input file gives a system
> with two spin-up electrons. In this case, yes, the H atoms want to move
> apart to become two independent atoms. So, in the spin-polarized
> calculation, you need to fix the initial spin to zero.
> FixSpin T
> TotalSpin 0.0
> Then I get the H2 binding energy of -4.8 eV. (It will be a little smaller
> when corrected by BSSE).
>
> Spin polarization is essential for the correct description of the H atom
> (not essential for the molecule).
>
> Also, as Haibo said, only the gamma point is needed for an isolated
> molecules, more k-points just take more time.
>
> Regards,
>
> Natalia
>
> On 2/28/11, Haibo Guo <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Only gamma point is needed for isolated molecules or atoms. Spin
>> polarization can be included; you need a initial antiferromagnetic
>> configuration for H2. But without spin, the results should be close
>> because H2 molecules don't have net spin polarization.
>>
>> H2 should behave well with most functionals. Here are some of my
>> results of the binding energy (eV per bond):
>>
>> PBE (siesta): 4.76
>> PBE (vasp): 4.54
>> HSE06 (vasp): 4.53
>>
>> Hope this helps.
>>
>> Haibo
>>
>>
>>
>> 2011/2/28 Süle Péter <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>  Dear Leila,
>>>
>>> for me using siesta-2.0.2 with your fdf file (GGA/PBE, 5X5)
>>>
>>>  0.75 -31.5205 eV/H2
>>>  10.   -25.4867
>>>  inf   -24.3496
>>>
>>>  Ec= ~ -3.5854 eV/atom (e.g. -7.17 eV bond energy)
>>>
>>> which is not bad. I mean one can not necessariliy expect with GGA a
>>> better value. Hybdrid functionals should give better results. The
>>> issue of better VASP values should be discussed in a more detail by
>>> experts since indeed quite oftenly happens.
>>>
>>>  Best regards, Péter Sule
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------
>>> Dr. Peter Sule
>>> senior research associate
>>> Institue for Technical Physics and Materials Science (MTA-MFA),
>>> Konkoly-Thege M. 29-33, Budapest, Hungary
>>> tel.: (36) 1 392 2222/3605
>>> fax.: (36) 1 392 22 73
>>> www.mfa.kfki.hu/~sule / [email protected]
>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, leila wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi, everyone,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I want to do some calculations on the H effect in Fe, before which I
>>>> have to promise the accuracy of H potential. I first make a simple
>>>> tests of the
>>>> H2
>>>> properties, including the H-H distance in H2, and also the binding
>>>> energy (Defined as the energy difference of the H2 molecular and two
>>>> isolated H atom).
>>>>
>>>> I find the H-H distance is around 0.75 Ang, which is near to the
>>>> experimental value of 0.741 Ang, for both LDA and GGA pseudopotential.
>>>> However, the binding energy is always not correct, calculated to be
>>>> around
>>>> -7.2 eV (The experimental and VASP results are all around -4.55 eV).
>>>> My input file for H are in the attachments.
>>>>
>>>> I don’t know where the issues are. Could anybody help me?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   In addition, I find that the spin polarization contributes a lot
>>>> in the
>>>> H2
>>>> calculations. When I add the spin polarization effect in the VASP
>>>> and SIESTA calculations, the H-H distance becomes to 2.89 Ang, and
>>>> the binding energy is approaching to 0 eV. Can anyone explain this
>>>> to me. Because Fe is magnetic materials, I have to consider spin
>>>> polarization effect in my calculation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you in advance!
>>>>
>>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Leila
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Attachment: H-SpinPol.fdf
Description: application/vnd.fdf

Attachment: H2-SpinPol-Fix.fdf
Description: application/vnd.fdf

Responder a