Can we please get details of the conflict so we can have context.

Also, if you are not partaking in discussions regarding this policy, that
leaves a single chair to deliberate.  You might want to appoint a proxy for
deliberations on this policy and consider policy to address this situation
in the future.  For example, what is both chairs had a conflict?


...Skeeve

*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
[email protected] ; www.eintellegonetworks.com

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
linkedin.com/in/skeeve

twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com


The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering


On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Andy Linton <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Andy Linton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dear SIG members
>>
>>  The proposal "prop-110v001: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 as Anycast to support
>> DNS Infrastructure" has been sent to the Policy SIG for review. It will
>> be presented at the Policy SIG at APNIC 37 in Petaling Jaya, Malaysia,
>> on Thursday, 27 February 2014.
>>
>>
> Dear SIG members,
>
> It has come to my attention today that a conflict of interest arises with
> this policy proposal and another activity I am involved in.
>
> As a result, I will be asking my co-chair, Masato-san,  to take charge of
> the processing of this proposal during this discussion period, at the Open
> Policy Meeting and, if it proceeds further, during the Consensus Period.
>
> Please continue to debate this and the other policy proposals.
>
> See those of you who plan to come to KL shortly
>
> andy
>
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>     *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
>
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to