Thx, Dean.

Is there anyone who want to continue this proposal?

Rgs,
Masato



On 14/03/03 9:59, "Dean Pemberton" <[email protected]> wrote:

> After consideration of all the factors highlighted on the mailing list and in
> person at both the OPM and AMM, the authors do not wish to proceed with this
> proposal. 
> 
> Regards,
> Dean
> 
> On Tuesday, March 4, 2014, Masato Yamanishi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> Geoff and Dean,
>> 
>> As next step, can you share your thought as the authors whether continue the
>> discussion or withdraw this proposal?
>> 
>> Rgs,
>> Masato
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2014-03-03 5:27 GMT-08:00 Masato Yamanishi <[email protected]
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >:
>>> Dear colleagues
>>> 
>>> Version 2 of prop-110: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 <http://1.2.3.0/24>  as Anycast
>>> to support DNS
>>> Infrastructure, reached consensus at the APNIC 37 Policy SIG, but did
>>> not reach consensus at the APNIC 37 Member Meeting.
>>> 
>>> Therefore, this proposal is being returned to the authors and the Policy
>>> SIG mailing list for further consideration.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Proposal details
>>> ----------------
>>> 
>>> The objective of this proposal is to permit the use 1.2.3.0/24
>>> <http://1.2.3.0/24>  as
>>> anycast addresses to be used in context of scoped routing to support the
>>> deployment of DNS resolvers.
>>> 
>>> Proposal details including the full text of the proposal, history, and
>>> links to mailing list discussions are available at:
>>> 
>>>        http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-110
>>> <http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-110>
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> Masato
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> prop-110v002: Designate 1.2.3.0/24 <http://1.2.3.0/24>  as Anycast to
>>> support DNS
>>>               Infrastructure
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Proposers:       Dean Pemberton, [email protected]
>>>                  Geoff Huston, [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 1. Problem statement
>>> --------------------
>>> 
>>>    Network 1 (1.0.0.0/8 <http://1.0.0.0/8> ) was allocated to APNIC by the
>>> IANA on 19
>>>    January 2010. In line with standard practice APNIC's Resource Quality
>>>    Assurance activities determined that 95% of the address space would
>>>    be suitable for delegation as it was found to be relatively free of
>>>    unwanted traffic [1].
>>> 
>>>    Testing, conducted by APNIC R&D found that certain blocks within
>>>    Network 1 attract significant amounts of unwanted traffic, primarily
>>>    due to its unauthorised use as private address space [2].
>>> 
>>>    Analysis revealed that, prior to any delegations being made from the
>>>    block, 1.0.0.0/8 <http://1.0.0.0/8>  attracted an average of 140Mbps -
>>> 160Mbps of
>>>    unsolicited incoming traffic as a continuous sustained traffic level,
>>>    with peak bursts of over 800Mbps.
>>> 
>>>    The analysis highlighted individual addresses such as 1.2.3.4 with
>>>    its covering /24 (identified as 1.2.3.0/24 <http://1.2.3.0/24> ) remain
>>> in APNIC
>>>    quarantine and it is believed they will not be suitable for normal
>>>    address distribution.
>>> 
>>>    The proposal proposes the use of 1.2.3.0/24 <http://1.2.3.0/24>  in a
>>> context of locally
>>>    scoped infrastructure support for DNS resolvers.
>>> 
>>> 2. Objective of policy change
>>> -----------------------------
>>> 
>>>    As the addresses attract extremely high levels of unsolicited
>>>    incoming traffic, the block has been withheld from allocation and
>>>    periodically checked to determine if the incoming traffic profile has
>>>    altered. None has been observed to date. After four years, it now
>>>    seems unlikely there will ever be any change in the incoming traffic
>>>    profile.
>>> 
>>>    The objective of this proposal is to permit the use 1.2.3.0/24
>>> <http://1.2.3.0/24>  as a
>>>    anycast addresses to be used in context of scoped routing to support
>>>    the deployment of DNS resolvers. It is
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Masato Yamanishi
>> SVP, Network Engineering
>> Japan Telecom America
>> Tel: +1-213-623-0797 ext.106
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Dean Pemberton
> 
> Technical Policy Advisor
> InternetNZ
> +64 21 920 363 (mob)
> [email protected]
> 
> To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.


*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to