On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Kenny Huang, Ph.D. <[email protected]>wrote:
> One scenario can be : ISPs without 1.2.3.0/24 control, receiving anycast > announced by various sources > to redirect 1.2.3.0/24 traffic. This scenario causes additional concern > in name resolution. > Thank you, this is a well-defined scenario to discuss. If the ISP is not checking RPKI, how would this be different from (evil me) announcing 208.67.222.0/24<https://ri.renesys.com/ri/grad?fn=prefixtool&prefix=208.67.222.0/24&t0=1394433679&t1=1394448079>, which is the range used by OpenDNS? (And if the ISP uses RPKI, and bogon filters, then my announcement will never affect him anyway) Again, I am not saying that I am not evil, I am trying to understand how prop-110 makes things worse. -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
