Randy and Dean,
On 14/05/21 1:22, "Randy Bush" <[email protected]> wrote: >> And even if today's chairs are able to use it as a single input into >> their decision making process, I think that it maybe too tempting a >> fall back for future chairs. > >$100 says that we will be voting within five years IMO, another problem is the consensus and Chairs' decision making process are not well described in SIG guideline (and almost nothing in PDP), so Chairs have too much flexibility when making decision. I think 100% fixed rule is not appropriate for our community, but do you have any idea to improve current description? Rgs, Masato Yamanishi APNIC Policy SIG Co-Chair > >this is a bad path > >randy >* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * >_______________________________________________ >sig-policy mailing list >[email protected] >http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
