Owen,

The intent is not to give people as many AS's as they want, and indeed few
businesses would ever need more than 1 AS.

What about if businesses did not have the multi-homing requirement for the
first ASN they were issued?


...Skeeve

*Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker*
*v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service
[email protected] ; www.v4now.com

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/v4now ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
linkedin.com/in/skeeve

twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com


IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> > On Feb 25, 2015, at 00:32 , Skeeve Stevens <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry Dean, I don't agree with you.
> >
> > You guys are trying to tell people how to run their networks, and that
> they aren't allowed to pre-emptively design their connectivity to allow for
> changing to multi-homing, or away from it, without going through a change
> in network configuration.
> >
> > That might be easy for you, but that is simply your opinion on how
> things should be done... not a reason why others shouldn't be allowed to do
> it the way they want to.
> >
> > If a member has a portable range, they should be entitled to - with no
> restrictions - a ASN number to be able to BE as portable as they want to.
>
> Even if I agreed with what you have said above, and I do not, this last
> statement bears no resemblence to the policy you have proposed.
>
> If you want to propose a policy that matches your last sentence, I would
> not oppose that, so long as any additional ASNs had to be issued under the
> current multihome requirement.
>
> However, your proposal doesn’t say someone who has PI space is entitled to
> 1 ASN. It says anyone who wants one is entitled to as many ASNs as they
> want.
>
> That’s simply a bad idea.
>
> Owen
>
>
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to