Hi, Just to mention that Izumi mentioned what is also largely requested and done at the AfriNIC region as well. I don't think there is any policy implication for member that peers with a different ASN other than the ones provided during application.
Cheers! sent from Google nexus 4 kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 27 Feb 2015 06:14, "Izumi Okutani" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2015/02/27 14:00, Aftab Siddiqui wrote: > > Hi Guangliang, > > > > > >> The option "b" is acceptable. > >> > >> b. If an applicant can demonstrate a plan to be multihomed in > >> immediate future, it is not a must they are physically multihomed > >> at the time of submitting a request > >> > > > > But even then applicant has to provide the details of those ASN with whom > > they may or may not multhome in future. right? > > > > I don't know whether it's adequate to do the same case in the APNIC > region but sharing our case as a reference - > > JPNIC requests for contact information for those ASNs they plan to be > connected. > > We sometimes we contact the upstreams and confirm the plan and this > seems to be working OK. > > > Regards, > Izumi > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
