This is where the big different in philosophy is.

I want to be able to choose to get an ASN and ready my network to be
multi-homed - 'at some point'

Dean says do it with private ASN and then reconfigure your network when you
are ready.

Frankly, I still think this is telling me how to plan the building of my
networks - and telling me when I should do the work.


...Skeeve

*Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker*
*v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service
[email protected] ; www.v4now.com

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/v4now ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
linkedin.com/in/skeeve

twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com


IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Dean Pemberton <[email protected]>
wrote:

> It did say "immediate future".
> I would say that it seems reasonable that if you're claiming that
> you're going to multihome in the "immediate future" that you would
> know the ASNs with whom you were going to peer.
>
> If it was more of a "Well at some point we might want to multihome",
> then you might not know the ASN.  But in those situations RFC1930 says
> that you should be using a private AS until such time as you are
> closer to peering.
>
> Dean
> --
> Dean Pemberton
>
> Technical Policy Advisor
> InternetNZ
> +64 21 920 363 (mob)
> [email protected]
>
> To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Aftab Siddiqui
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Guangliang,
> >
> >>
> >> The option "b" is acceptable.
> >>
> >> b. If an applicant can demonstrate a plan to be multihomed in
> >>      immediate future, it is not a must they are physically multihomed
> >>      at the time of submitting a request
> >
> >
> > But even then applicant has to provide the details of those ASN with whom
> > they may or may not multhome in future. right?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Aftab A. Siddiqui
> >
> > *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> > *
> > _______________________________________________
> > sig-policy mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> >
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>    *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to