On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> wrote:
> > See criterion #3 at https://blog.apnic.net/2014/09/02/2-byte-asn-run-out/ > for a brief explanation of why 2-byte ASNs are still preferred for IXP > peering. > Scott, thank you. I was looking only at the other peer, and its equipment, supporting 4byte. As we are not using communities (small operator, here), I did not remember that use case. -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
