I agree with Izumi. That a policy can be reverted at the AMM when it is passed at Policy SIG is unacceptable. It is duplication, redundant and a waste of time. Policy should be 'reported' at the AMM, but not discussed or debated, as the Policy SIG is the appropriate venue for this.
...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service ske...@v4now.com ; www.v4now.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Izumi Okutani <iz...@nic.ad.jp> wrote: > Great to know this Philip. > > We had simliar issue last year, where we discussed about the proposal on > reserving a space for DNS anycast, and due to parallel session, some > operators could not attend. It got rediscussed at the AMM and the > consensus at Policy SIG got reverted. I think it's not efficient that > consensus decisions needs to be rediscussed due to parallel sessions and > not everyone could participate at Policy SIG. > > I provided input to an APNIC staff after the session last year and would > like to raise this again. > > > Thanks, > Izumi > > > > On 2015/03/02 12:07, Philip Smith wrote: > > FWIW, a few years ago we did have at least two APRICOTs where there was > > nothing in parallel with the Thursday Policy SIG. It meant that the > > technical/ops part of the conference finished on Wednesday. APRICOT 2009 > > was one example - for reference. (And tech/ops people left on Wednesday > > night.) > > > > But we reverted to putting regular conference content in parallel with > > the Policy SIG following requests and feedback for that. > > > > And yes, if there is clear desire from the Policy SIG to be standalone, > > the APRICOT PC will pay very close attention to that desire. :-) > > > > philip > > -- > > > > > > Skeeve Stevens wrote on 2/03/2015 12:04 : > >> OK... so a year in the future... that should easily be dealt with by > >> talking to the Apricot Program Committee... as it is a very reasonable > >> and obvious thing to do. > >> > >> Is it possible for this meeting? Competing event for Policy means there > >> will be little reason to entice people to come . > >> > >> > >> ...Skeeve > >> > >> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* > >> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service > >> ske...@v4now.com <mailto:ske...@v4now.com> ; www.v4now.com > >> <http://www.v4now.com/> > >> > >> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve > >> > >> facebook.com/v4now > >> <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> > linkedin.com/in/skeeve > >> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve> > >> > >> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; > >> blog: www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/> > >> > >> > >> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Masato Yamanishi <myama...@gmail.com > >> <mailto:myama...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> Skeeve, > >> > >> Unfortunately, I don't think we can change the schedule in this > meeting. > >> I'm asking about future meetings. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Masato > >> > >> 2015-03-01 18:46 GMT-08:00 Skeeve Stevens <ske...@v4now.com > >> <mailto:ske...@v4now.com>>: > >> > >> Masato-san, > >> > >> Are you suggesting that we are able to change either Policy or > >> Lightening talks for this event? I would love to go to both. > >> > >> I think this is only really a problem at Apricot events, not > >> APNIC events. > >> > >> > >> ...Skeeve > >> > >> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* > >> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service > >> ske...@v4now.com <mailto:ske...@v4now.com> ; www.v4now.com > >> <http://www.v4now.com/> > >> > >> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 > >> <tel:%2B61%20%280%29414%20753%20383> ; skype://skeeve > >> > >> facebook.com/v4now > >> <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau > >linkedin.com/in/skeeve > >> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve> > >> > >> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; > >> blog: www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/> > >> > >> > >> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Masato Yamanishi > >> <myama...@gmail.com <mailto:myama...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> Dear All, > >> > >> While this point was raised by Jessica, Skeeve, and Dean > >> during the ML discussion, > >> it is also big question for me, which day and time-slot is > >> best for Policy SIG. > >> > >> Historically, we have SIG session somewhere in Thu. > >> However, do you think it is a barrier for wider > participation? > >> (e.g. many operators are leaving in Thu PM?) > >> > >> Also, which session should not be in parallel with Policy > SIG? > >> (I also don't want to miss Lightning talks as Skeeve > mentioned) > >> > >> Please share your thoughts on this list and/or offline in > >> Fukuoka. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Masato Yamanishi > >> APNIC Policy SIG Chair (Acting) > >> > >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource > management > >> policy * > >> _______________________________________________ > >> sig-policy mailing list > >> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net <mailto: > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net> > >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > >> _______________________________________________ > >> sig-policy mailing list > >> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > >> > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > > _______________________________________________ > > sig-policy mailing list > > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
