Let's try again? What were the objections last time?
...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service [email protected] ; www.v4now.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Dean Pemberton <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree. Thats why I was in favour of abandoning the AMM consensus. > Unfortunately the policy failed. > -- > Dean Pemberton > > Technical Policy Advisor > InternetNZ > +64 21 920 363 (mob) > [email protected] > > To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential. > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Izumi Okutani <[email protected]> wrote: > > Great to know this Philip. > > > > We had simliar issue last year, where we discussed about the proposal on > > reserving a space for DNS anycast, and due to parallel session, some > > operators could not attend. It got rediscussed at the AMM and the > > consensus at Policy SIG got reverted. I think it's not efficient that > > consensus decisions needs to be rediscussed due to parallel sessions and > > not everyone could participate at Policy SIG. > > > > I provided input to an APNIC staff after the session last year and would > > like to raise this again. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Izumi > > > > > > > > On 2015/03/02 12:07, Philip Smith wrote: > >> FWIW, a few years ago we did have at least two APRICOTs where there was > >> nothing in parallel with the Thursday Policy SIG. It meant that the > >> technical/ops part of the conference finished on Wednesday. APRICOT 2009 > >> was one example - for reference. (And tech/ops people left on Wednesday > >> night.) > >> > >> But we reverted to putting regular conference content in parallel with > >> the Policy SIG following requests and feedback for that. > >> > >> And yes, if there is clear desire from the Policy SIG to be standalone, > >> the APRICOT PC will pay very close attention to that desire. :-) > >> > >> philip > >> -- > >> > >> > >> Skeeve Stevens wrote on 2/03/2015 12:04 : > >>> OK... so a year in the future... that should easily be dealt with by > >>> talking to the Apricot Program Committee... as it is a very reasonable > >>> and obvious thing to do. > >>> > >>> Is it possible for this meeting? Competing event for Policy means > there > >>> will be little reason to entice people to come . > >>> > >>> > >>> ...Skeeve > >>> > >>> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* > >>> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service > >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; www.v4now.com > >>> <http://www.v4now.com/> > >>> > >>> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve > >>> > >>> facebook.com/v4now > >>> <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> > linkedin.com/in/skeeve > >>> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve> > >>> > >>> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; > >>> blog: www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/> > >>> > >>> > >>> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers > >>> > >>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Masato Yamanishi <[email protected] > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Skeeve, > >>> > >>> Unfortunately, I don't think we can change the schedule in this > meeting. > >>> I'm asking about future meetings. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Masato > >>> > >>> 2015-03-01 18:46 GMT-08:00 Skeeve Stevens <[email protected] > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: > >>> > >>> Masato-san, > >>> > >>> Are you suggesting that we are able to change either Policy or > >>> Lightening talks for this event? I would love to go to both. > >>> > >>> I think this is only really a problem at Apricot events, not > >>> APNIC events. > >>> > >>> > >>> ...Skeeve > >>> > >>> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* > >>> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service > >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; www.v4now.com > >>> <http://www.v4now.com/> > >>> > >>> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 > >>> <tel:%2B61%20%280%29414%20753%20383> ; skype://skeeve > >>> > >>> facebook.com/v4now > >>> <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; < > http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve > >>> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve> > >>> > >>> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; > >>> blog: www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/> > >>> > >>> > >>> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers > >>> > >>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Masato Yamanishi > >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Dear All, > >>> > >>> While this point was raised by Jessica, Skeeve, and Dean > >>> during the ML discussion, > >>> it is also big question for me, which day and time-slot is > >>> best for Policy SIG. > >>> > >>> Historically, we have SIG session somewhere in Thu. > >>> However, do you think it is a barrier for wider > participation? > >>> (e.g. many operators are leaving in Thu PM?) > >>> > >>> Also, which session should not be in parallel with Policy > SIG? > >>> (I also don't want to miss Lightning talks as Skeeve > mentioned) > >>> > >>> Please share your thoughts on this list and/or offline in > >>> Fukuoka. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Masato Yamanishi > >>> APNIC Policy SIG Chair (Acting) > >>> > >>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource > management > >>> policy * > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> sig-policy mailing list > >>> [email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]> > >>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> sig-policy mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > >>> > >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > >> _______________________________________________ > >> sig-policy mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > >> > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > > _______________________________________________ > > sig-policy mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
