I agree. On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote:
> I do not support the proposal. > > Contorting policy around the abomination that is CGN instead of > recognizing that no amount of policy or other contortion will preserve > usability in IPv4 and just getting on with the business of making IPv6 > deployment ubiquitous is counterproductive for the internet as a whole and > for each and every individual subjected to these ridiculous and > dysfunctional hacks. > > NAT was bad enough. NAT on top of NAT and so-called “Carrier Grade” NAT > and all of these other stupid net tricks are in desperate need of > deprecation. > >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
