Aftab and All,

I'm very sorry that I didn't express myself well in the meeting and in the
report,
(please understand that Adam and I should make this report in 15mins)
but I expect the author to improve prop-115 based on the discussion and the
survey result.

Regards,
Masato Yamanishi
APNIC SIG Chair

2015-09-14 22:13 GMT+09:00 Aftab Siddiqui <[email protected]>:

>
> I believe, "pushed back to mailing list for discussion" and "returned the
> proposal to authors for further consideration" are two different things.
>
> *From Transcript:*
>
>     So I need to decide how to proceed with this proposal
>
>     itself.
>
>         Let me push back this proposal to the mailing list
>
>     and also ask to have such survey to the AMM this
>
>     evening.  Is it okay?
>
>
> *From AMM Report:*
>
>
> [image: Screenshot 2015-09-14 23.07.34.png]
>
>
>>
>> Version 3 of prop-115: Registration of detailed assignment information
>> in whois DB, did not reach consensus at the APNIC 40 Open
>> Policy Meeting.
>>
>> The Policy SIG Chair requested the Secretariat conduct further research
>> into the problem statement and returned the proposal to the authors for
>> further consideration.
>>
>>
> Best Wishes,
>
> Aftab A. Siddiqui.
>
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to