Hi Lu, 1st: I would say no. There are no followups after allocation and there should not be due to the many complication issues that can happen.
2nd: I would say no. The changing of network infrastructure should NOT invalidate the original request which is approved. ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service [email protected] ; www.v4now.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com ; Keybase: https://keybase.io/skeeve IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Lu Heng <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I have an policy question regarding the "need". > > We all know when RIR makes approves assignment LIR made if it is beyond > LIR's assignment window, while the "need" has changed, the assignment > become invalid. > > The question come to what the definition of need, as a young people here, > I am a bit confused, Below I have few examples, please enlighten me if > anyone has an thought about it. > > First one: > > Company A provides 100 customer dedicated server service at location A, > RIR makes an assignment for 100 IP for his infrastructure, if, under > condition that no other factor was changed, Company A moved his > infrastructure to location B, but still providing same service to same > customer, does the company's action need to be notified to RIR? And does > this action considered invalid the original assignment? > > Second one: > > Company A provides web hosting service, but any casted in 3 location, and > has provided the evidence of 3 location to the RIR during the time the > company getting valid assignment, then A decided to cut 3 location to 2 > location, does this invalid original assignment and need to be notified to > RIR? > > So the bottom line is, what is the definition of need, is it defined as > the service you are providing or defined as whole package of any of > original justification material was provided, if was the later, then does > it imply that anything, including location of the infrastructure, upstream > providers etc has changed due to operational need, it will be considered as > change of purpose of use and need to be notified to RIR? > > What should be the right interpretation of the policy by then? > > -- > -- > Kind regards. > Lu > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
