Lu, as I stated elsewhere, I did read your post, but I do not trust you. Owen
> On Dec 6, 2015, at 01:13 , h...@anytimechinese.com wrote: > > I have explained the reasoning of asking it fairly well in one of the list > and Owen just didn't read it and speculate my action, fair warning, read to > Owen, do not speculate people's action on public space without ground.l, > especially such action was already explained publicly. > > On 6 Dec 2015, at 5:06 AM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com > <mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote: > >> Fair warning, Lu asked the identical question on the ARIN list and (I >> presume the RIPE list since he left RIPE in all >> the key places in the one he posted to ARIN). >> >> It seems to me that he may be doing some form of registry policy shopping. >> >> Owen >> >>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 06:07 , Skeeve Stevens <ske...@v4now.com >>> <mailto:ske...@v4now.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Lu, >>> >>> 1st: I would say no. There are no followups after allocation and there >>> should not be due to the many complication issues that can happen. >>> >>> 2nd: I would say no. The changing of network infrastructure should NOT >>> invalidate the original request which is approved. >>> >>> >>> >>> ...Skeeve >>> >>> Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker >>> v4Now - an eintellego Networks service >>> ske...@v4now.com <mailto:ske...@v4now.com> ; www.v4now.com >>> <http://www.v4now.com/> >>> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve <> >>> facebook.com/v4now <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; >>> <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve >>> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve> >>> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; blog: >>> www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/> ; Keybase: >>> https://keybase.io/skeeve <https://keybase.io/skeeve> >>> >>> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Lu Heng <h...@anytimechinese.com >>> <mailto:h...@anytimechinese.com>> wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I have an policy question regarding the "need". >>> >>> We all know when RIR makes approves assignment LIR made if it is beyond >>> LIR's assignment window, while the "need" has changed, the assignment >>> become invalid. >>> >>> The question come to what the definition of need, as a young people here, I >>> am a bit confused, Below I have few examples, please enlighten me if anyone >>> has an thought about it. >>> >>> First one: >>> >>> Company A provides 100 customer dedicated server service at location A, RIR >>> makes an assignment for 100 IP for his infrastructure, if, under condition >>> that no other factor was changed, Company A moved his infrastructure to >>> location B, but still providing same service to same customer, does the >>> company's action need to be notified to RIR? And does this action >>> considered invalid the original assignment? >>> >>> Second one: >>> >>> Company A provides web hosting service, but any casted in 3 location, and >>> has provided the evidence of 3 location to the RIR during the time the >>> company getting valid assignment, then A decided to cut 3 location to 2 >>> location, does this invalid original assignment and need to be notified to >>> RIR? >>> >>> So the bottom line is, what is the definition of need, is it defined as the >>> service you are providing or defined as whole package of any of original >>> justification material was provided, if was the later, then does it imply >>> that anything, including location of the infrastructure, upstream providers >>> etc has changed due to operational need, it will be considered as change of >>> purpose of use and need to be notified to RIR? >>> >>> What should be the right interpretation of the policy by then? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> Kind regards. >>> Lu >>> >>> >>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >>> * >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sig-policy mailing list >>> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net> >>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >>> <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy> >>> >>> >>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >>> * >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sig-policy mailing list >>> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net> >>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >>> <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy> >>
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
