hi, Excuse the briefness of this mail, it was sent from a mobile device.
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 18:40, HENDERSON MIKE, MR <[email protected]> > wrote: > > “Or.. Just get over with it :)” > +1 > +1 prohibiting the right to transfer resources only by some members (or some colors of IP addresses) is, I believe, a very bad idea. i object to any kind of proposal that wants to block some kind of IP transfers but allow others. /elvis > > > > Regards > > > Mike > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Aftab Siddiqui > Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2016 12:55 p.m. > To: Yuya KAWAKAMI; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [sig-policy] New Policy Proposal prop-116: Prohibit to transfer > IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block > > prop-116 is similar to prop-106 with few cosmetic changes so it would be good > to review the old discussion. > > I wonder if there can be better way to prevent such kind of transfer. > > > Yes, there is a better way, scrap prop-105 and stop handing over additional > /22 for no reason and add the recovered resources to final /8 pool. Or.. Just > get over with it :) > -- > Best Wishes, > > Aftab A. Siddiqui > The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended for the > addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not necessarily > the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force. If you are > not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or > distribute this message or the information in it. If you have received this > message in error, please Email or telephone the sender immediately. > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
