Excuse the briefness of this mail, it was sent from a mobile device.
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 18:40, HENDERSON MIKE, MR <michael.hender...@nzdf.mil.nz>
> “Or.. Just get over with it :)”
prohibiting the right to transfer resources only by some members (or some
colors of IP addresses) is, I believe, a very bad idea.
i object to any kind of proposal that wants to block some kind of IP transfers
but allow others.
> From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
> [mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Aftab Siddiqui
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2016 12:55 p.m.
> To: Yuya KAWAKAMI; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] New Policy Proposal prop-116: Prohibit to transfer
> IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block
> prop-116 is similar to prop-106 with few cosmetic changes so it would be good
> to review the old discussion.
> I wonder if there can be better way to prevent such kind of transfer.
> Yes, there is a better way, scrap prop-105 and stop handing over additional
> /22 for no reason and add the recovered resources to final /8 pool. Or.. Just
> get over with it :)
> Best Wishes,
> Aftab A. Siddiqui
> The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended for the
> addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not necessarily
> the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force. If you are
> not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or
> distribute this message or the information in it. If you have received this
> message in error, please Email or telephone the sender immediately.
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> sig-policy mailing list
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
sig-policy mailing list