Its better to wait for the updated version of prop-116 which hopefully will address most of the issues raised here and were raised during APNIC42. Tomohiro San agreed to come up with a solution so its just a matter of few more weeks :)
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 23:45 Sumon Ahmed Sabir <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Community Members, > > > > Under current IPv4 policy, each APNIC account holder can request a /22 > > from the Final /8 pool (103/8) and a /22 from the IPv4 Recovered Address > > Pool. > > > > There is currently a waiting list for delegations from the recovered > > address pool. > > > > If an APNIC Member closes their membership and returns a 103/8 block of > > addresses to APNIC, this space is placed in the recovered pool not in > > the Final /8 pool. > > > > The Secretariat would like to confirm where the policy community would > > like these addresses returned to, either the Final /8 Pool, or the IPv4 > > Recovered Address Pool. > > > > Advantages of returning recovered 103/8 addresses to the Final /8 pool > > > > - The Final /8 pool will last longer. > > > > - Policies such as prop-116 are easier and fairer to implement. > > > > Disadvantage of returning recovered 103/8 addresses to the Final /8 pool > > > > - Not everybody receiving delegations from 103/8 will get a “clean”, > > unused block. > > > > - Members on the waiting list for addresses from the recovered pool > > will wait longer. > > > > Please reply to the mailing list to provide your feedback and opinion. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Masato, Sumon > > APNIC Policy SIG Chairs > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy -- Best Wishes, Aftab A. Siddiqui
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
