Dear Colleagues,
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-120, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Many support expressed on clarifying how IPv4 addresses should be distributed after /8 pool exhaustion. Different ideas were shared on details of how to distribute. * It is appropriate to prioritise new comers to a certain extent, as they will be challenged if they cannot receive IPv4 address block * Different comments on the size of distribution post /8 pool exhaustion 1) /21 as the upper limit Maintain the current size 2) /22 as the upper limit Adjust to the limited pool post /8 pool exhaustion 3) Two blocks of /22s as the upper limit Separate blocks for new comers and others. New comers can queue to receive the other block after receiving a block for new comers Other comments: * Care should be taken when adopting this policy, to reflect the waiting list of distribution from the returned pool * Consideration needed on how to handle transfer of 103/8 block if prop-116 is adopted (Prefixes will be mixed after the exhaustion of unallocated final /8 pool) Best Regards, Satoru Tsurumaki Policy Working Group Japan Open Policy Forum 2017-08-09 15:17 GMT+09:00 chku <c...@twnic.net.tw>: > Dear SIG members > > The proposal "prop-120: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan" has been sent > to the Policy SIG for review. > > It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 44 which will > be held in Taichung, Taiwan on Wednesday and Thursday, 14 & 15 September > 2017. > > We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list > before the meeting. > > The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an > important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to > express your views on the proposal: > > - Do you support or oppose this proposal? > - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal? > - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? > - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more > effective? > > Information about this proposal is available at: > > http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-120 > > Regards > > Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng > APNIC Policy SIG Chairs > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > prop-120-v001: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Proposer: Tomohiro Fujisaki > fujis...@syce.net > > > 1. Problem statement > -------------------- > > APNIC makes IPv4 address delegation from two IPv4 pools. These are the > 103/8 (Final /8) pool and the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered pool. > > Currently, there are no IPv4 addresses in the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered > pool and APNIC manages a Recovered Pool Waiting List for approved > requests. And, based on the Geoff's projection (*1), the 103/8 (Final > /8) pool will be exhausted in a few years. > > It will be necessary to make a guidance about how to manage the IPv4 > delegation after both IPv4 pools exhaustion. > > > 2. Objective of policy change > ----------------------------- > > To provide a guidance for 103/8 pool exhaustion. > > > 3. Situation in other regions > ----------------------------- > > None. > > > 4. Proposed policy solution > --------------------------- > > Guidance for 103/8 pool exhaustion: > > - The first time an approved request cannot be fulfilled from the 103/8 > pool, Final /8 delegations will end. > > - APNIC will begin to manage only one (Recovered) IPv4 pool containing > any residual 103/8 space and all future returns, including 103/8 returns. > > - Each new account holder can receive up to a /21 from the IPv4 > Recovered pool. > > - Existing account holders who have not yet received the maximum /21 > from the two pools may continue to apply for space from the Recovered > pool until they have received a maximum /21 from the two pools. > > - A waiting list will be created if approved requests cannot be > fulfilled. Each new account holder will be given priority in the > waiting list. > > > 5. Advantages / Disadvantages > ----------------------------- > > Advantages: > > - Possible to avoid confusion at 103/8 address pool exhaustion date > > Disadvantages: > > None. > > > 6. Impact on resource holders > ------------------------------ > > No impact to resource holders. > > > 7. References > ------------- > 1. IPv4 Address Report > http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/ > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sig-policy-chair mailing list > sig-policy-ch...@apnic.net > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy-chair > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
