Dear Tsurumaki-san, Thank you so much for your comment.
> * Consideration needed on how to handle transfer of 103/8 block if > prop-116 is adopted (Prefixes will be mixed after the exhaustion of > unallocated final /8 pool) I'll update prop-116 to avoid this confusion. Yours Sincerely, --- Tomohiro Fujsiaki 2017-09-08 15:33 GMT+09:00 Satoru Tsurumaki <[email protected]>: > Dear Colleagues, > > > I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. > > I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-120, > based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. > > > > Many support expressed on clarifying how IPv4 addresses should be > distributed after /8 pool exhaustion. Different ideas were shared on > details of how to distribute. > > * It is appropriate to prioritise new comers to a certain extent, as > they will be challenged if they cannot receive IPv4 address block > > * Different comments on the size of distribution post /8 pool exhaustion > 1) /21 as the upper limit > Maintain the current size > > 2) /22 as the upper limit > Adjust to the limited pool post /8 pool exhaustion > > 3) Two blocks of /22s as the upper limit > Separate blocks for new comers and others. New comers can queue to > receive the other block after receiving a block for new comers > > Other comments: > * Care should be taken when adopting this policy, to reflect the > waiting list of distribution from the returned pool > > * Consideration needed on how to handle transfer of 103/8 block if > prop-116 is adopted (Prefixes will be mixed after the exhaustion of > unallocated final /8 pool) > > > Best Regards, > > Satoru Tsurumaki > Policy Working Group > Japan Open Policy Forum > > 2017-08-09 15:17 GMT+09:00 chku <[email protected]>: >> Dear SIG members >> >> The proposal "prop-120: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan" has been sent >> to the Policy SIG for review. >> >> It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 44 which will >> be held in Taichung, Taiwan on Wednesday and Thursday, 14 & 15 September >> 2017. >> >> We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list >> before the meeting. >> >> The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an >> important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to >> express your views on the proposal: >> >> - Do you support or oppose this proposal? >> - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal? >> - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? >> - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more >> effective? >> >> Information about this proposal is available at: >> >> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-120 >> >> Regards >> >> Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng >> APNIC Policy SIG Chairs >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> prop-120-v001: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Proposer: Tomohiro Fujisaki >> [email protected] >> >> >> 1. Problem statement >> -------------------- >> >> APNIC makes IPv4 address delegation from two IPv4 pools. These are the >> 103/8 (Final /8) pool and the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered pool. >> >> Currently, there are no IPv4 addresses in the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered >> pool and APNIC manages a Recovered Pool Waiting List for approved >> requests. And, based on the Geoff's projection (*1), the 103/8 (Final >> /8) pool will be exhausted in a few years. >> >> It will be necessary to make a guidance about how to manage the IPv4 >> delegation after both IPv4 pools exhaustion. >> >> >> 2. Objective of policy change >> ----------------------------- >> >> To provide a guidance for 103/8 pool exhaustion. >> >> >> 3. Situation in other regions >> ----------------------------- >> >> None. >> >> >> 4. Proposed policy solution >> --------------------------- >> >> Guidance for 103/8 pool exhaustion: >> >> - The first time an approved request cannot be fulfilled from the 103/8 >> pool, Final /8 delegations will end. >> >> - APNIC will begin to manage only one (Recovered) IPv4 pool containing >> any residual 103/8 space and all future returns, including 103/8 returns. >> >> - Each new account holder can receive up to a /21 from the IPv4 >> Recovered pool. >> >> - Existing account holders who have not yet received the maximum /21 >> from the two pools may continue to apply for space from the Recovered >> pool until they have received a maximum /21 from the two pools. >> >> - A waiting list will be created if approved requests cannot be >> fulfilled. Each new account holder will be given priority in the >> waiting list. >> >> >> 5. Advantages / Disadvantages >> ----------------------------- >> >> Advantages: >> >> - Possible to avoid confusion at 103/8 address pool exhaustion date >> >> Disadvantages: >> >> None. >> >> >> 6. Impact on resource holders >> ------------------------------ >> >> No impact to resource holders. >> >> >> 7. References >> ------------- >> 1. IPv4 Address Report >> http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sig-policy-chair mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy-chair >> >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >> * >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
