Not supported

The proposal should in my opinion be amended to read:
___________________________

Disadvantages:



None Completely negates the purpose of prop-116-v006: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 
addresses in

the final /8 block.
___________________________


Regards


Mike

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bertrand Cherrier
Sent: Friday, 26 January 2018 4:28 p.m.
To: [email protected]
Subject: [sig-policy] prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy

Dear SIG members,

The proposal "prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy" has
been sent to the Policy SIG for review.

It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 45 in
Kathmandu, Nepal on Tuesday, 27 February 2018.

We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list
before the meeting.

The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an
important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to
express your views on the proposal:

 - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
 - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so,
   tell the community about your situation.
 - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
 - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
 - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
   effective?

Information about this proposal is available at:

   http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-123

Regards

Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng
APNIC Policy SIG Chairs

https://www.apnic.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/prop-123-v001.txt


-------------------------------------------------------



prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy



-------------------------------------------------------



Proposer:        Alex Yang

                 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>





1. Problem statement

-------------------------------------------------------



Policy Proposal prop-116-v006: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in

the final /8 block reached consensus at the APNIC 44 AMM on 14 Sep

2017. Since that APNIC has stopped all the IPv4 transfers from 103/8

block if the delegation date is less than 5 years.



However, some of the 103/8 ranges were delegated before 14 Sep 2017.

Those resources should not be subjected to 5 years restriction. The

community was not aware of the restriction when they received those

resources, some of the resources have been transferred or planning to

transfer. If APNIC is not allow those transfers to be registered,

there will be underground transfers. This will cause incorrect APNIC

Whois data.





2. Objective of policy change

-------------------------------------------------------



To keep the APNIC Whois data correct.





3. Situation in other regions

-------------------------------------------------------



No such situation in other regions.





4. Proposed policy solution

-------------------------------------------------------



“Prohibit transfer IPv4 addresses under final /8 address block (103/8)

which have not passed five years after its allocation/assignment”

should only apply to those ranges were delegated from APNIC since 14

Sep 2017.





5. Advantages / Disadvantages

-------------------------------------------------------



Advantages:



- Allow APNIC to register those 103/8 transfers to keep the APNIC

  Whois data correct.





Disadvantages:



None.





6. Impact on resource holders

-------------------------------------------------------



Resource holders are allowed to transfer 103/8 ranges if the resources

were delegated before 14 Sep 2017.







7. References

-------------------------------------------------------

The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or 
distribute this message or the information in it.

If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to