Hi Satoru san, Thanks for gathering feedback from the community. Let me try to respond.
> * I am worried that the change a allocation size and this discussion > will be repeated each time the 103/8 address pool decreases. > > * It should be /24 in this time if it will be changed it in the future. > > * I'd like to know the reason why "/23", not "/24" or other prefix size. > There are only 2 viable options, either /23 or /24 there can not be any other prefix size. I believe /23 is big enough for a new entrant whether a small ISP or an enterprise to keep their infrastructure dual stacked or keep it for a transition technology. > > * /23 seems too small for a newcomer. > Its a contradicting to above 2 points. If /23 is small then how come /24 is enough? and as of today how /22 was enough? > * A Newcomer can choose a transfer as a alternative if the proposal not > reach consensus. > Yes they can abosolutely. But we need to manage the resources available at the moment in the best possible way. > > > Best Regards, > > Satoru Tsurumaki > JPOPF-ST > > 2019年1月18日(金) 15:17 Bertrand Cherrier <[email protected]>: > >> Dear SIG members, >> >> The proposal "prop-127-v001: Change maximum delegation size of 103/8 >> IPv4 address pool to a /23" has been sent to the Policy SIG for review. >> >> It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 47 in >> Daejeon, South Korea on Wednesday, 27 February 2019. >> >> We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list >> before the meeting. >> >> The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an >> important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to >> express your views on the proposal: >> >> - Do you support or oppose this proposal? >> - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so, >> tell the community about your situation. >> - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal? >> - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? >> - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more >> effective? >> >> Information about this proposal is available at: >> >> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-127 >> >> Regards >> >> Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng >> APNIC Policy SIG Chairs >> ------------------------------ >> >> prop-127-v001: Change maximum delegation size of 103/8 IPv4 address >> pool to a /23 >> ------------------------------ >> >> Proposers: Ching-Heng Ku, Aftab Siddiqui, Yen-Chieh Wang >> [email protected] >> 1. Problem Statement >> >> This is a proposal to change the maximum size of IPv4 address delegations >> from the APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address pool [1] to a /23. >> 2. Objective of policy change >> >> The current final /8 allocation policy[1] requires that the current >> minimum >> delegation size for IPv4 is a /24 and each APNIC account holder is only >> eligible >> to receive IPv4 address delegations totalling a maximum /22 from the >> APNIC 103/8 >> IPv4 address pool. >> >> According to the APNIC IPv4 Address Report, https://ipv4.potaroo.net/, >> remaining >> addresses in the APNIC 103/8 pool are 42.8%, 33.3%, 23.4% of /8 in the >> end of >> 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively. The remaining number of APNIC 103/8 >> IPv4 >> address pool for APNIC account holder is less and less. It is predicted >> that >> the 103/8 pool will be exhausted in 2020. >> >> Reducing the maximum IPv4 delegation size from APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address >> pool can >> prolong the exhaustion time of the 103/8. Newcomers of APNIC account >> holders will >> have the benefit in this period of time. New companies can obtain some >> IPv4 address >> space in the APNIC service region without the need to trade for address >> space and >> can make the preparation for the subsequent IPv6 migration. >> >> It is recommended that the number of assigned IPv4 addresses in Final /8 >> be reduced >> from a maximum of /22 to /23. It will be estimated to extend the >> exhaustion time >> for at least three years or more. >> 3. Situation in other regions >> >> There is no similar policy in place in other RIR regions. >> 4. Proposed policy solution >> >> It is proposed to modify the 6.1 Minimum and maximum IPv4 delegations of >> the APNIC >> Internet Number Resource Policies[1]. >> >> This proposal is to change the maximum size of IPv4 address delegations >> from the >> APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address pool[1] to a /23. /23 is important because new >> ISPs can >> use /24 for internal infrastructure and /24 customer assignments and NAT >> for IPv6 >> transition. >> >> Current Policy text >> >> Each APNIC account holder is only eligible to receive IPv4 address >> delegations >> totalling a maximum /22 from the APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address pool. >> >> New Policy text >> >> Each APNIC account holder without APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address delegations >> from the >> APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address pool is only eligible to receive a maximum /23 >> from the >> APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address pool. >> 5. Advantages / Disadvantages >> >> Advantages: >> - This proposal allows a greater range of networks to access the >> resources in >> the final /8. >> >> - This proposal extends the maximum possible total number of networks >> that can benefit from the final /8 pool from around 16,000 to around >> 18,000 >> networks, providing small amounts of IPv4 to be available for networks, >> developing economy, etc., making the transition to IPv6 for many years to >> come. >> >> Disadvantages: >> - No disadvantages are foreseen. >> 6. Impact on resource holders >> >> It reduces the maximum size of the delegated address block available to >> APNIC >> members during the final /8 phase. This will affect NIR members in the >> same way >> as APNIC members. >> 7. References >> >> [1] Section 6.1. "Minimum and maximum IPv4 delegations" of "Policies for >> IPv4 address >> space management in the Asia Pacific region" >> https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/resources#Part-2-IPv4-Policy >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >> * >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
