Hi Vivek/Aftab,
The updated  policy should be applicable for NIR members too and not
limited to APNIC membership only in my opinion.
Regards,
Ajai Kumar

On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 06:15, Vivek Nigam <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Aftab,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Vivek
>
>
>
> *From: *Aftab Siddiqui <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 15 September 2021 at 8:47 am
> *To: *Vivek Nigam <[email protected]>
> *Cc: *Bertrand Cherrier <[email protected]>, mailman_SIG-policy <
> [email protected]>
> *Subject: *Re: [sig-policy] prop-141-v002: Change maximum delegation,
> size of IPv4 address from 512 ( /23 ) to 768 (/23+/24) addresses
>
>
>
> Hi Vivek,
>
>
>
> We would like some clarification on the following two points as they are
> not consistent.
>
> > Increasing the maximum IPv4 delegation size from /23 to /23+/24 IPv4
> address pool will allow Newcomers and also
> > Existing APNIC account holders who only received /23 after Thursday, 28
> February 2019 to receive 256 (/24) IPv4
> > addresses.
>
> The above point suggests regardless when an organization became an APNIC
> member, if they only received /23 after Thursday, 28 February 2019, they
> will be eligible to receive an additional /24.
> What happens if an account holder had only received a /24 before Thursday,
> 28 February 2019? Would they be excluded from receiving this additional
> delegation?
>
>
>
> Anyone who became a member after 28th February 2019 was only eligible for
> a maximum of /23. So anyone who received /23 after 28th Feb is eligible for
> extra /24. Anyone who only received /24 after 28th Feb is eligible for /23
> (/24 as per existing policy and /24 from this proposed policy).
>
>
>
>
> > The Organization who became an APNIC member after Thursday, 28 February
> 2019 and received only /23, can receive
> > another /24 IPv4 Resources.
>
> The above point suggests that only those organizations who became an APNIC
> member after Thursday, 28 February 2019 are eligible for this additional
> delegation.
>
>
>
> I understand your point, this statement not only applicable to members who
> were impacted by the change of policy from /22 to /23 on 28th Feb 2019 but
> Any member who only received /23 or /24 under previous policy (max
> delegation size of /22 or before that), who had the opportunity to receive
> up to /22 and they either never asked for it or were not eligible that time
> can still apply for extra IPv4 addresses. This Is because we are suggesting
> to increase the maximum delegation size from /23 (512 IPv4 addresses) to
> /23 + /24 (768 IPv4 addresses), we have submitted the updated the text
> without any date reference to make sure there is no confusion.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Vivek
>
> On 8/9/21, 8:04 am, "[email protected] on behalf of
> Bertrand Cherrier" <[email protected] on behalf of
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>     Dear SIG members,
>
>     A new version of the proposal "prop-141-v002: Change maximum delegation
>     size of IPv4 address from 512 ( /23 ) to 768 (/23+/24) addresses" has
>     been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
>
>     It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting (OPM) at APNIC 52
>     on Thursday, 16 September 2021.
>
>
> https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fconference.apnic.net%2F52%2Fprogram%2Fschedule%2F%23%2Fday%2F4&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7Ceacb8eda14bc4e33f6d908d9724b394d%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637666490899858782%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=Ecb%2F0sTectMW8UL03w9f8aCpprpr2wMiwGVuZGjKNgc%3D&amp;reserved=0
> <https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fconference.apnic.net%2F52%2Fprogram%2Fschedule%2F%23%2Fday%2F4&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cf4cb1afbf7ff4078c13008d977d16b98%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637672564683896297%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=Jum%2BI4olP2CxNS1%2BGG1I16wKOdJ9QhYHpI7C78bQBQ4%3D&reserved=0>
>
>     We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing
>     list before the OPM.
>
>     The comment period on the mailing list before the OPM is an important
>     part of the Policy Development Process (PDP). We encourage you to
>     express your views on the proposal:
>
>        - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
>        - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so,
>           tell the community about your situation.
>        - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
>        - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
>        - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
> effective?
>
>     Information about earlier versions is available at:
>
>
> https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apnic.net%2Fpolicy%2Fproposals%2Fprop-141&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7Ceacb8eda14bc4e33f6d908d9724b394d%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637666490899858782%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=wDguOAVH5Rw%2FFFKibNrMOXWY6IKyBro1v6E%2BdSLqftk%3D&amp;reserved=0
> <https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apnic.net%2Fpolicy%2Fproposals%2Fprop-141&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cf4cb1afbf7ff4078c13008d977d16b98%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637672564683896297%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=R9afm6bgF%2BLyZv%2Bowa%2F0tfVZWPlBbKchEJI3vTslPIk%3D&reserved=0>
>
>     Regards,
>     Bertrand and Ching-Heng
>     APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>     prop-141-v002: Change maximum delegation size of IPv4 address from 512
> (
>     /23 ) to 768 (/23+/24) addresses.
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>     Proposer: Simon Sohel Baroi ([email protected])
>                Aftab Siddiqui ([email protected])
>
>
>     1. Problem statement
>     --------------------
>     According to the APNIC IPv4 Address
>     Report,(
> https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apnic.net%2Fmanage-ip%2Fipv4-exhaustion%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7Ceacb8eda14bc4e33f6d908d9724b394d%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637666490899858782%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=woiVPfJDoZi8SpN4T9X3wViWhESF2qHTjxy746iVTuQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> <https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apnic.net%2Fmanage-ip%2Fipv4-exhaustion%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cf4cb1afbf7ff4078c13008d977d16b98%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637672564683906287%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=f4D2sWfVt4OFyUFmB9Buu%2BhbLWjPzg0mzPAGQY5sIAY%3D&reserved=0>
> ) the available
>     and reserve pool size is as follows:
>
>     Available Pool : IP Address 3,782,144 | 14,774 Of /24
>     Reserved Pool : IP Address 1,831,680 | 7,155 Of /24
>
>     If APNIC continues to delegate IPv4 in size of /23 with the average
>     growth rate of 145 x /23 delegations per
>     month the pool will be exhausted around Aug/Sep 2027. Which means the
>     huge number of IPv4 addresses will be
>     unused for a long time and large community members will still remain
>     behind the NAT box or without Internet
>     Connectivity.
>
>
>     2. Objective of policy change
>     -----------------------------
>     The current final /8 allocation policy [1] advise that the current
>     minimum delegation size for IPv4 is 256 (/24)
>     addresses and each APNIC account holder is only eligible to receive
> IPv4
>     address delegations totaling a maximum
>     512 (/23) addresses from the APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address pool. (6.1.
>     Minimum and maximum IPv4 delegations)
>
>     This is a proposal to change the maximum size of IPv4 address
>     delegations from the available IPv4 address pool to
>     a totaling of 768 (/23+/24) addresses. This proposal also indicates
> how
>     APNIC will distribute the IPv4 resources
>     systematically when the available pool size reduces.
>
>     Increasing the maximum IPv4 delegation size from /23 to /23+/24 IPv4
>     address pool will allow Newcomers and also
>     Existing APNIC account holders who only received /23 after Thursday,
> 28
>     February 2019 to receive 256 (/24) IPv4
>     addresses.
>
>
>     3. Situation in other regions
>     -----------------------------
>     There is no similar policy in place in other RIR regions.
>
>
>     4. Proposed policy solution
>     ---------------------------
>     It is recommended to increase the IPv4 address delegation size from
> 512
>     max (/23) to 768 (/23 + /24). The address
>     space can now be allocated from the available 103/8 last /8 block
> and/or
>     from non 103/8 recovered address blocks.
>     This policy will continue until the available + reserved comes down to
>     less than 900,000 IPv4 addresses i.e.
>     < 3515x/24, once reaching this threshold the maximum delegation size
>     will revert back to 512 IPv4 addresses (/23)
>     and will continue to do so until the available + reserved block comes
>     down to 256,000 IPv4 addresses i.e 1000x/24
>     then the delegation size will further reduce to 256 IPv4 addresses
> i.e.
>     /24. The very first time the reserved and
>     available pool goes below 190,000 IPv4 addresses then the IPv4
> reserved
>     pool (APNIC-127 Section 5.1.1) for Future
>     Use of /16 (i.e. 256 x /24s) will be added to the available pool.
>
>     Thresholds for IPv4 addresses (Available + Reserved):
>
>     - More than 900,000 IPv4 addresses: Delegation /23 + /24
>     - Less than 900,000 IPv4 addresses AND More than 256,000 IPv4
> addresses:
>     Delegation /23
>     - Less than 256,000 IPv4 addresses: Delegation /24
>     - Less than 190,000 IPv4 addresses - add APNIC-127 5.1.1 Reserved /16
> to
>     available pool: Delegation /24
>
>
>     It is proposed to modify the section 6.1 maximum IPv4 delegations of
> the
>     APNIC Internet Number Resource Policies
>     [1] accordingly.
>
>     Current Policy text :
>
>     Since Thursday, 28 February 2019, each APNIC account holder is only
>     eligible to receive IPv4 address delegations
>     totalling a maximum /23 from the APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address pool.
>
>     New Policy text :
>
>     New APNIC account holder is only eligible to receive IPv4 address
>     delegations totaling a maximum 768 (/23+/24) from
>     the APNIC available IPv4 address pool.
>
>     Existing APNIC account holders (since Thursday, 28 February 2019), who
>     only have /23 can apply for another /24 maintaining
>     the criteria matched with section 7.0.
>
>     If the available IPv4 Pool size, which consists of available and
> reserve
>     pool goes below 900,000 addresses (3515, /24s
>     after last delegation), the delegation size will automatically become
>     512 (/23) IPv4 addresses.
>
>     If the available IPv4 Pool size, which consists of available and
>     reserve, reaches 256,000 IPv4 addresses (i.e. 1000 /24s
>     after last delegation), the delegation size will be reduced to 256
> (/24)
>     IPv4 addresses. The very first time the reserved
>     and available pool goes below 190,000 IPv4 addresses then the IPv4
>     reserved pool of /16 (256 /24s) will be added to the
>     available pool (APNIC-127 Section 5.1.1).
>
>     At any point, if APNIC receives a large block of
> recovered/returned/etc
>     IPv4 address space increasing the total available
>     address space and moved into the previous threshold then the
> delegation
>     size will revert back to previous delegation size
>     as well. Also, all delegations at this stage have to be made
>     retrospectively i.e. any member who received smaller delegation
>     size will be eligible to receive more IPv4 addresses as per this
> policy,
>     based on their usage criteria matched with
>     section 7.0 and availability of addresses.
>
>
>
>     5. Advantages / Disadvantages
>     -----------------------------
>     Advantages:
>     - This proposal will ensure smooth allocation of IPv4 addresses to
>     existing and new APNIC members.
>
>     Disadvantages:
>     - This might add up to 10,000 /24s into the global routing table i.e.
>     1.2% increase. The current growth rate without this
>     policy is approximately 7% every year.
>
>
>     6. Impact on resource holders
>     -----------------------------
>     The Organization who became an APNIC member after Thursday, 28
> February
>     2019 and received only /23, can receive another
>     /24 IPv4 Resources.
>
>
>     7. References
>     -------------
>     [1] Section 6.1. "Minimum and maximum IPv4 delegations" of "Policies
> for
>     IPv4 address
>     space management in the Asia Pacific region"
>
> https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apnic.net%2Fcommunity%2Fpolicy%2Fresources%236.1.-Minimum-and-maximum-IPv4-delegations&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7Ceacb8eda14bc4e33f6d908d9724b394d%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637666490899858782%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=F05%2BmjaHuY07Cdnsp92dQX0vSIbYGlG9X2i7IHA%2Fkg0%3D&amp;reserved=0
> <https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apnic.net%2Fcommunity%2Fpolicy%2Fresources%236.1.-Minimum-and-maximum-IPv4-delegations&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cf4cb1afbf7ff4078c13008d977d16b98%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637672564683906287%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=yDo0KpP5fIVEcWhOJ9hNvyLN7FNkZ8yhRzP%2BvdH0m8w%3D&reserved=0>
>
>     --
>     Cordialement,
>     ___________________________________________
>     Bertrand Cherrier
>     Administration Systèmes - R&D
>     Micro Logic Systems
>
> https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mls.nc%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7Ceacb8eda14bc4e33f6d908d9724b394d%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637666490899868777%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=1iQhnmvcE6qDphqXvkAOFZWTascSdQUaK9aB6eEhuR0%3D&amp;reserved=0
> <https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mls.nc%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cf4cb1afbf7ff4078c13008d977d16b98%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637672564683916283%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=Z2VvJ%2F73QGgAMckOuok%2F3S3V3WSF4UgydRmAvS4xNQ0%3D&reserved=0>
>     Tél : +687 24 99 24
>     VoIP : 65 24 99 24
>     SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min)
>
>     *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>        *
>     _______________________________________________
>     sig-policy mailing list
>     [email protected]
>
> https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.apnic.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsig-policy&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7Ceacb8eda14bc4e33f6d908d9724b394d%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637666490899868777%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=vmpi0tUojec3mlq68ujizpxQU4X9yLdejeePBLe2rOQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> <https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.apnic.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsig-policy&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cf4cb1afbf7ff4078c13008d977d16b98%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637672564683916283%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=YvtFPXxWWmb4J%2BsSHa5qEbcaeKRJAhxv7Th%2FiMCkW8w%3D&reserved=0>
>
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>    *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> <https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.apnic.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsig-policy&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cf4cb1afbf7ff4078c13008d977d16b98%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637672564683926278%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=9RLUfyVisfiGtMyamCvfe68BhDCYji7311MVmRMTkkE%3D&reserved=0>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Aftab A. Siddiqui
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>    *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy



-- 

(M) +91-9868477444
Skype ID:erajay
P-mail: joinajay1 at gmail.com
.................................
Please don't print this email unless you really need to. This will preserve
trees on our planet.
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to