Hi Gaurav, Thanks for your comments On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 16:31, Gaurav Kansal <[email protected]> wrote:
> We should avoid un-limited number of terms for any member in any role, > like max 2 consecutive tenure for any post and a cool off period of 2-4 > years for next tenure and have a max limit on an individual member tenures. > NRC is for review of all elected community nominations. For this particular suggestion, you have to change SIG guidelines, NRO-NC election procedure and also the APNIC bylaws. This change is out of the scope of NRC but your point is taken and NRC can publish the number of years a candidate has already served on a particular seat. > This will help in bringing the new blood into the system and will be able > to achieve geographical diversity , plus a rotation will be able to help us > in catching the flaws/frauds in the very early stages. > If you read the document then you will understand how we are supporting at least the geographical diversity in the NRC. While I do support your point of geographical diversity, to make it clear Diversity is not about geography only and we have to make APNIC more inclusive at every level. from geographical pov EC - 7 members representing 7 different economies NRO NC - 3 members 3 different economies SIG - Routing Security - 3 members 3 economies SIG - Cooperation - 2 members 2 economies SIG - NIR - 2 members 2 economies SIG - Policy - 3 members 3 economies Out of these 20 elected members there are at least 15 different economies represented here out of 56 economies of APNIC service region. We have to think and achieve the resilience so that we should be in a same > position of AFRINIC. > Any further suggestions to improve the NRC? Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui > > On 25-Aug-2022, at 05:38, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > As you are aware the current nomination process for any community elected > position is defined where APNIC secretariat sends the call for nomination > on various forums and once they (secretariat) receives the nominations an > internal due diligence process is performed and then the names of nominees > are published with their details. The process ran so far on a need-to-know > basis and the community had access to information that was deemed essential > by the Secretariat. In order to build a strong and community driven > structure it is important to have community oversight in the whole > process, which at the moment doesn't exist. For that reason we are > proposing a new committee called "Nomination Review Committee" and we > believe that it will bring much needed improvements to the process of > electing members to various community elected positions. > > Please review the proposal here > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w0uANFm5j1qCFCxQR_rXlwyGg_4NXme50J-HcZ0QeQM/edit?usp=sharing> > and provide your feedback through the mailing list. We are also organising > a BoF > <https://conference.apnic.net/54/program/schedule/#/day/6/bof---apnic-nominating-committee-nomcom> > on 14th Sep during APNIC54 to further discuss this in-person/online. > > BoF: > https://conference.apnic.net/54/program/schedule/#/day/6/bof---apnic-nominating-committee-nomcom > > Link: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w0uANFm5j1qCFCxQR_rXlwyGg_4NXme50J-HcZ0QeQM/edit?usp=sharing > > > Regards, > > Aftab A. Siddiqui > On behalf of SIG Chairs/Co-Chairs > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > > <https://amritmahotsav.nic.in/> > >
_______________________________________________ sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
