Hi, > However, that agreement may not be necessary. The holder of a /32 allocated > under current policies can use that space legitimately, while also having > plenty of spare /64s. And each of those /64 prefixes bears enough /128 > addresses to identify 2^64 (18 billion billion) objects. > > Perhaps the authors might consider that if an existing IPv6 holder wants to > implement their scheme, they could simply take a single /64 from their IPv6 > space and use it as proposed. That could even be the same /64 which is > assigned to the server of information about the objects identified within the > prefix (an implementation detail which is probably beyond the scope of this > discussion). >
Very much this. I must confess that I’ve only been peripherally watching this discussion and had meant to go back and read it in more detail to try and understand why this wasn’t an option… Cheers, Rob
_______________________________________________ SIG-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
