Dear SIG members,
 
Here is the Secretariat impact analysis for proposal “prop-162-v003: WHOIS 
Privacy” and the same is also published at:
 
    https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/prop-162/RegardsDave 
Phelanon Behalf of APNIC Secretariat 
1. APNIC’s Understanding of the Proposed Policy
This Proposed Policy refers to bulk access to WHOIS data as a "Service" rather 
than a "Policy", and there is no mention of this Service in the "APNIC Internet 
Number Resource Policies (apnic-127)”.
The Proposed Policy suggests eliminating the unnecessary publication of APNIC 
Resource Holder organization contact details (email addresses, telephone 
numbers, and physical addresses) from any bulk access to WHOIS data. People 
with a legitimate need for these contact details can use the WHOIS search 
facilities (website/WHOIS/RDAP) provided by APNIC.
References:Bulk access to WHOIS data
Acceptable Use Policy (AUP)
APNIC WHOIS data acceptable use agreement
2. Impact of Proposed Policy on Registry and Addressing System
No Impact expected
3. Impact of Proposed Policy on APNIC Operation/Services
The Secretariat would like to highlight a section of the text for clarification 
from the author:


Section 4 Mentions “APNIC should cause any existing bulk users of APNIC WHOIS 
data to remove the Contact Information from their own systems and from the 
Internet.”


APNIC will have limited ability to monitor with respect to previously 
downloaded and/or published WHOIS data unless a clear breach of the AUA has 
occurred and it can be tied to a specific party.




As NRTM(Near Real-Time Mirroring) data already filters this information, adding 
filtering to the WHOIS is a minimal task
4. Legal Impact of Policy


No legal issues identified with the removal of the contact information from 
Org, IRT, and role objects, however, desc/remarks fields within the 
inetnum/inet6num fields will remain visible if they contain such contact 
information. 


Access to WHOIS data:


The current WHOIS data acceptable use agreement (AUA) does not contemplate the 
revocation of access by APNIC. However, APNIC can implement stronger terms and 
require accession to them for continued access to the bulk WHOIS data. This 
would not address prior issues, but may help limit the impact going forward.




Removal of published contact information:


The existing AUA does not contemplate a requirement to delete prior data 
without evidence of misuse. As noted above with respect to access, APNIC can 
remove ongoing access until such time as the re-publisher accedes to new terms.




5. Implementation
There is a Medium impact on Software teams, and High impact on The legal team


Updates to WHOIS Data Acceptable use agreement (AUA) apnic-091


In accordance with the current Editorial Policy, all documents with a 
"document-ref" number must comply with the 4-week call for Editorial comments 
for any updates.




Automatic removal after set time period (requires entering into AUA again, 
interval to be determined)


Revocation of access to Bulk WHOIS data for current existing users


Implementation of improved system to record acceptance of new terms for each 
entity and ensure contact/entity details remain current and accurate (assisted 
with requirement to renew periodically).


Filtering the Data Set for Bulk WHOIS consumption


If this proposal reaches consensus, implementation time frame would be 
approximately 4 months subject to the call for editorial comments period.
 
 
_______________________________________________
SIG-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to