The wierd part of that is the blocky output from two pipes. Just as an
experiment, have you tried running the "two grep" command in a different
terminal or possibly shell? I would be interested to know where that
behavior is coming from.

Austin Bingham
Laboratory for Intelligent Processes and Systems
University of Texas at Austin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----


>To answer your question, grep, egrep, fgrep do not support negative
>lookahead assertion. Perl and tcl (and prob others) do. Read man perlre
>for more on that. (It basically lets you specify in one regex to match
><expression> iff <other expression> doesn't match. I regularly pipe
>through two greps, often with the -v flag and have no problems. I doubt
>it's a tail or grep problem iow.
>
>jason h fowler wrote:
>>
>> hey ... i'm trying to filter the output of tail ...
>> i know to show everything that says "something" all i have to do is pipe
>> the output of tail into grep ... like:
>> tail -f /etc/httpd/logs/access_log | grep something
>> and i know to have everything show except for "somethingelse" i do:
>> tail -f /etc/httpd/logs/access_log | grep -v somethingelse
>> but can i, using one grep command, show only "something" but not
>> "somethingelse" ? ...
>> i've tryed:
>> tail -f /etc/httpd/logs/access_log | grep someting | grep -v
>> somethingelse
>> but that spits out big hunks every 1-2 minutes ... it doesn't actually
>> follow it real time ... and yes i have read the man page for it ... but
>> i didn't see anything to say about combining what i want to search for
>> and what i want to skip ... if it's painfully obvious, please help me
>> out ... sometimes i'm pretty stupid ... (c:
>> thanx a lot,
>> jason fowler
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to