damn don't get all offensive cheif...i was offering my two cents...and you
are way off on that OOP statement....you obviously don't know perl that
well...
On Thu, 11 May 2000, tom carlile wrote:
>
> i never said i didn't know perl. i would say i know perl pretty
> well actually. no one who really wants OOP would use perl
> for their project, period.
> i didn't really ask for help with perl, ugh.
>
> On Thu, 11 May 2000, root wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 13:04:20 -0500 (CDT)
> > To: tom carlile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Ruby, a better Perl?
> >
> > perl is a really good language...chances are you are
> > going to have way more support/portability with it...and i bet perl is
> > easier to teach yourself...and i suggest picking up advanced perl by
> > oreilly, shows you the object oriented side of perl, it's really not that
> > bad..
> >
> > On Tue, 9 May 2000, tom carlile wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > i was wondering if anyone here has played with a scripting language
> > > called Ruby. it apparently borrows a lot from Perl but did the OOP
> > > part in a more sane way; they claim pure OOP like Smalltalk. anyway
> > > it looks like Python and Perl rolled into one and is very popular in
> > > Japan. has anyone played with it? i don't want to waste my time...
> > >
> > > http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
