Bert Vermeulen <bert@...> writes:
>
> On 08/26/2014 12:48 AM, Scott Lombard wrote:
> > From: Scott Lombard <lombardenator@...>
> >
> > ---
> > src/hardware/fluke-dmm/api.c | 1 +
> > src/hardware/fluke-dmm/fluke-dmm.h | 1 +
> > src/hardware/fluke-dmm/fluke.c | 4 ++--
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/hardware/fluke-dmm/api.c b/src/hardware/fluke-dmm/api.c
> > index 3d739a1..1ebe0af 100644
> > --- a/src/hardware/fluke-dmm/api.c
> > +++ b/src/hardware/fluke-dmm/api.c
> > <at> <at> -57,6 +57,7 <at> <at> static const struct
flukedmm_profile supported_flukedmm[] = {
> > { FLUKE_189, "189", 100, 1000 },
> > { FLUKE_287, "287", 100, 1000 },
> > { FLUKE_190, "199B", 1000, 3500 },
> > + { FLUKE_289, "289", 100, 1000},
>
> Scott,
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> Can you confirm that the 289 works for you? I know it's supposed to be
> similar to the 287, but it was left out until somebody can verify it works
> as intended with this driver.
>
> Also, I understand that the 289 has internal data logging. Is there a way to
> retrieve that internal log and "play it back" for the sigrok driver?
>
> (By the way your patch has an extra hunk that adds a stray space)
>
Hi all,
I just tried my new Fluke 289 with:
sigrok-cli 0.5.0
Using libsigrok 0.3.0 (lib version 2:0:0).
Using libsigrokdecode 0.3.0 (lib version 2:0:0).
On Ubuntu 15.04.
And it didn't get recognised directly, even though
it appears it did send an id string: http://pastebin.com/9WU6gE8p
Am I doing something wrong? or does extra sigrok need extra support.
and if so how can I help?
Thanks and Regards,
Bogdan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
sigrok-devel mailing list
sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
