Hi, On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 08:29:57PM +0300, Paul Fertser wrote: > I think it would be much better to change this to > > You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > > (that's verbatim from GPLv3) > > As explicit FSF post address is problematic because they can move (and > have already moved at least once recently).
Yeah, it would be great if someone provided a patch to mass-convert all files (starting with libsigrokdecode maybe) to this version, it's been on our todo list for a while now indeed. Uwe. -- http://hermann-uwe.de | http://randomprojects.org | http://sigrok.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ sigrok-devel mailing list sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
