On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 18:29 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 08:29:57PM +0300, Paul Fertser wrote:
> > I think it would be much better to change this to
> >
> > You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> > along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> >
> > (that's verbatim from GPLv3)
> >
> > As explicit FSF post address is problematic because they can move (and
> > have already moved at least once recently).
>
> Yeah, it would be great if someone provided a patch to mass-convert all
> files (starting with libsigrokdecode maybe) to this version, it's been
> on our todo list for a while now indeed.
Just for your information, and to not duplicate work: I ran an
edit session for the libsigrok, libsigrokdecode, pulseview,
sigrok-cli, sigrok-dumps, sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw,
sigrok-firmware, sigrok-meter, sigrok-test, and sigrok-util
subprojects and sent the patches to Uwe. libserialport did not
need adjustment.
virtually yours
Gerhard Sittig
--
If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
ask your parents or an adult to help you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
sigrok-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
