Gerhard Sittig <gerhard.sit...@gmx.net> wrote: > > Somebody mentioned that -S should not completely get axed, but > should work as before for a single stack, and emit an > appropriate message for multiple stacks. Can't tell whether you > addressed this concern.
I have not. I don't remember any of that discussion. Could you, or anyone else elaborate on what it should really mean? I mean, I could leave the -S option and simply _ignore_ it, but I still have no idea how the -S option could actually ever have done anything, at all. You had to list the decoders in -a anyway, the option seems completely redundant. Sincerely, Karl P
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
_______________________________________________ sigrok-devel mailing list sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
