No, the patch is no more needed. Your device should work without it.
Can you test the latest git version?

Regards,
Georg

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Obbard" <ch...@64studio.com>
To: "duc" <duc_...@gmx.net>
Cc: sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 9:52:17 AM
Subject: Re: [sigrok-devel] Request to merge fix for broken korad-kaxxxxp driver

Hi,
On the subject of the korad driver, I have written
https://github.com/sigrokproject/libsigrok/pull/188 to add the model I
own. Is it still relevant to be merged or should it be dropped ?

Thanks
Christopher Obbard

On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 08:44, Georg Hofmann <duc_...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Thanks for your quick correction. No problem to drop my patch, it was only
> a quick fix to get my device working. I also think that the version should
> not be a required part in the device identification!
>
> Anyway, I have just compiled and tested git head and it's working find with
> my device (KD3005D V6.6).
>
> Thank you very match for all your work, it's really a great project!
>
> Regards,
> Georg
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gerhard Sittig" <gerhard.sit...@gmx.net>
> To: sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2022 2:56:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [sigrok-devel] Request to merge fix for broken korad-kaxxxxp 
> driver
>
> On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 11:17 +0200, Georg Hofmann wrote:
> >
> > I have another pull request 
> > (https://github.com/sigrokproject/libsigrok/pull/196)
> > which fixes not recognized devices by the korad-kaxxxxp driver. Currently
> > a device is not recognized each time the device version changes. I have 
> > added another
> > stage in the scan process where the version is excluded.
>
> That approach of yours would have weakened the version
> information check (would not check for 'V', would not check for
> digits and periods, would not check for exhaustively covering of
> all input text). But most of all it would not work for those
> devices which lack whitespace separation of response fields.
>
> That's why I took a different route. And because your submission
> and my approach were done around the same time, so I could not
> take yours after I started a more thorough generic approach. The
> series is a little longer, to simplify review and help readers
> see what's happening.
>
> https://sigrok.org/gitaction/libsigrok.git/1776a19..68321f7
>
> > A bugzilla report is opened for this issue: #1500.
>
> Seems it's more like 1800.
> https://sigrok.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1800
>
>
> A plea to all:
>
> Can users of Korad PSUs and clones please run as many tests as
> they can? Firmware versions should no longer be an issue. The
> libsigrok 1776a1976bfa..68321f73b924 commit series passes local
> synthetic tests for previously supported response texts. But only
> feedback from users who own the hardware can reliably verify the
> driver's proper operation.
>
>
> virtually yours
> Gerhard Sittig
> --
>      If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
>              ask your parents or an adult to help you.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sigrok-devel mailing list
> sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sigrok-devel mailing list
> sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel


_______________________________________________
sigrok-devel mailing list
sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel

Reply via email to