> What does your social media historical usage look like? Never having gotten into social media (why do they call one a social medium? because it's neither rare nor well done) my usage has stayed consistently flatlined throughout the XXI.
I get my "feeds" via RSS (so strictly chronological, and I click through to <3%) and prefer to surf via pull (in particular, search engines, like https://search.marginalia.nu/ , and I'm loving that youtube now only displays a search box) rather than push. In retrospect, I've always been a bit of a media curmudgeon: in the XX I had subscribed to "The Economist " and "Nature" because they were the only newsstand magazines that published articles with scatter plots, but cancelled both after they each had succumbed to the "Cosmopolitan" style of plastering contents on their covers. -Dave -- Silklist mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.panix.com/listinfo.cgi/silklist
