On Sat, Nov 1, 2025 at 8:49 PM Charles Haynes <[email protected]> wrote:
> As I said earlier, one value of this approach is that it serves as an >> ideological line in the sand. One could imagine hybrid approaches (such as, >> e.g, when someone decides to release software under GPL as well as, say, >> BSD) which exist only because the ideological extreme exists to ensure the >> Overton Window doesn't shift too far to one side. >> > > That's fine - but I'm asking what the line is, and what purpose it serves? > The GPL has an articulable goal - what is the intended line of this > license, and what is the ideological principle behind it? Is there one? Is > it more than "AI is bad?" > If you ask me, the principle would be "you don't get to make money off my work without my consent and fair compensation". This is independent of my opinion of the current IP law landscape, which, IMO, will crumble under its own inconsistencies at some point. Udhay
-- Silklist mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.panix.com/listinfo.cgi/silklist
