Indian film music (bollywood or other languages) has always had a
variety of influnences : Indian classical music (Carnatic/Hindustani),
Western classical as well as popular western music of the times.

To distinguish between various styles - just listen to it for a while -
it is a question of pattern recognition. If you want to pick up a
section of Indian film music, Tamil film music specifically (quite
different from bollywood music, atleast to the trained ear) check out
http://www.dhool.com.

A lot of songs in the archives here are accompanied by all kinds of
notes: about the base influences, singers, composer etc etc...

Vardhini


--- Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Well let's put it this way - a lot of older film music from bollywood
> 
> has hindustani (north indian, shall we say) influences. Movies from
> the 
> south (tamil, telugu etc) had a more carnatic base earlier.
> 
> And there have been cases of maestros singing, playing or composing
> for 
> bollywood and southie movies.
> 
> A lot of the newer songs have a more rock, pop, hiphop etc influence 
> these days.
> 
> There's this website you really need to check out - I2FS - "Inspired 
> Indian Film Songs".  You'll find everything from great music that's 
> inspired by another tune .. maybe just a shared idea the composers
> had, 
> or at the most a few bars but with a fairly distinctive
> interpretation
> 
> .. but increasingly, most songs in local movies are outright ripoffs 
> from foreign stuff.  Everything from Bach to Dr.Alban.
> 
> http://www.itwofs.com (with short realmedia clips playing both songs)
> 
> and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>       srs
> 
> Dave Long wrote:
> > As a niekulturny, I can't tell the difference between bollywood
> music 
> > and the (presumably turkish?) pop songs that get played at the
> kebab 
> > shop.  What should the neophyte listen for, to distinguish the two?
>  
> > (and, that having been achieved, what are the relations between
> film, 
> > hindustani, and carnatic music?)
> > 
> > -Dave
> > 
> > * oddly enough, francophones will call someone who is ignorant a
> "con" 
> > or a "nul" -- but never an "aux" or a "prn"
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to