On 21-Aug-06, at 12:54 PM, Madhu Menon wrote:
Udhay Shankar N wrote:
http://www.steorn.net/ is the firm's site. Anybody here have any
comments?
Seven signs of bogus science:
http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/signs.html
Not to be taking sides, but can't "free energy" be a tortured
euphemism for "renewable source of energy"? "Free" is a lot more
attention provoking, which may have been the intended effect. Pool up
money for one ad in a prestigious publication, and word it such that
everyone's going to talk about it, saving on ad-spend.
Seems legitimate so far.
(The science itself may or may not be.)
--
Kiran Jonnalagadda
http://jace.seacrow.com/
