"Ho-Chunk Media" "Indian" "Whiteman" "indigenous"
sounds like a chunk of an indigenous ho between an indian and a
whiteman.... so it got slamdunked as porn-spam....
I don't disagree, but shouldn't that be cross-ref'ed with some
content? I mean sounds like porn doesn't make it so, and especially
with academics which love to pick catchy titles.
And really, the full title:
Request to review "The Indians White Man: Ho-Chunk Media
Activism, Indian News, and an Indigenous Critique of Whiteness " for
Cultural Anthropology
Should also get flagged in the other direction right? Activism?
Critique? Review? Cultural Anthropology?
Casey
