On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 08:36:49AM +0530, Venkat Mangudi wrote:

> Quite agree with you there. But what about small discrete functionally
> independent pieces collaborating on bluetooth, maybe? Except the camera,
> which could be attached to the keypad. A watch that displays caller id
> or calling number, bluetooth headset and a small device that has the
> keypad and camera excite anyone? Or is it too many devices for us?

Way too many devices. I'd rather have something on the belt, and
a head-up display with pivotable camera, microphone and earbuds
(plus GPS, accelerometers and magnetic compass, and a LED array/lidar,
antenna etc).

It can be very well attached by a single cable, which is probably
a must with current power drain.

In the olden days the wearable guys used to roll their own. 
I've never had so much disposable cash, so I only looked on
from a distance. 

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

Reply via email to