On Monday 23 Jul 2007 7:42 pm, Shyam Visweswaran wrote:
> These individuals and
> entities have every right to gain monetarily from
> their inventions along with the companies that
> act merely as marketing conduits.

Interesting. 

I am seeing the manner in which inventor-surgeon and marketing company 
cooperate to make money in the case of some "advances". Some innovations are 
not necessarily beneficial or better, but are saleable because of some reason 
or other.

Typically in surgery the proof that something is really good or even "better" 
may not be evident for 5, 10 or 20 years - because patients can theoretically 
come back with problems related to a surgical device sometime later in his 
life (or uncover a problem by dying).

I have been watching the introduction of weird surgical implants for hernias 
and devices  for other diseases that are literally being tested out on 
patients using compliant doctors in countries like India, with Indian doctor 
getting the implant at a fraction of the going rate in exchange for using a 
lot of it, apart from sweeteners like all expenses paid trips to various 
places.

While many of these devices may not be unsafe, they may be of no extra benefit 
other than making money for one company over another.  Other devices may 
prove to better, or a mistake. The marketing and hype makes patients ask for 
the "innovation" and creates a rush of doctors wanting using it without being 
particularly choosy about where it might work best or whether it will work at 
all.

I think a type of cardiac stent was recently withdrawn from the US market when 
they started getting blocked - presumably leading to some deaths.

I just wonder if one should really differentiate between the value of 
innovation for therapeutic benefit versus the value of innovation for getting 
a patent and making some more money.

I am seeing the evolution of market driven medicine where patients demand 
treatment or investigation that is advertised. I find myself in a constant 
fight between the ethics I was taught and the risk of being declared obsolete 
for not blindly doing what's currently in fashion. As I get older I will 
probably change and just stop caring and merely follow fashion over surgical 
caution. That is what everyone wants and that is what doctors with lucrative 
practices must do. The role for ethical medicine is, in my view, gradually 
vanishing from India at least.

shiv



Reply via email to