On 9/11/07, Udhay Shankar N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > You are claiming that you weren't able to "plough through" the links. > But I am claiming that these links actually do offer a refutation of > your thesis. Is that not enough incentive? Or are you just taking the > piss here?
I think Shiv furthered the thread meaningfully by asking for a summary. I've been following the thread with some interest, but I really can't imagine myself being motivated to read through lots of linked text to get your argument. I for one am now more motivated to wade though your links in the light of your summary. Cheeni
