On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 07:34:18PM +0530, Biju Chacko wrote: > I'd agree that you shouldn't believe everything you read. But it would > be safer to err on the side of caution when deciding what to believe. > > I know comparatively little about Tor, but I'm sure it's no silver > bullet for privacy. I don't think it is possible for *any* tool to be
There's no silver bullet. But it makes things much, much more complicated for Mallory. Why I don't have anything to hide, I want Mallory to find that out the hard way. (Hey, it's their job. They get paid for it). > one. In this case, it's fairly obvious many of the users of Tor didn't > RTFM before using it. Simple thinking should have been enough. I never do online banking through Tor, whether SSL, or not. And whenever I cook up a batch of TATP (I used to do that when I was a bit younger, and detonate it wirelessly), you can very well assume nobody will find that out by SIGINT. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
