On 03/10/2007, shiv sastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A robust response to terrorism such as that displayed by the US comes with its > own price. Other current threads on this list lament the price that is being > paid, but hey the US _HAS_BEEN_ safe from terrorism hasn't it?
But is the response to terrorism and 9-11 by the US "robust"? If anything, it has only made Americans suspicious and distrustful of other Americans. If the aim of terrorism is to instil fear and disrupt economic activity, I'd say Americans of today are doing it quite well without assistance from AQ. Binand
