Venky TV wrote:
Interesting that this happened at the same time:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22567779-601,00.html
Nine untruths in Gore film: judge
Check out Friedman today:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/14/opinion/14friedman.html?_r=2&th=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&emc=th&adxnnlx=1192366942-VTdqZNwNJFYPeIyGoHNPxg
Last paragraph:
"In sum, Al Gore has been justly honored for highlighting — like no one
else — the climate challenge. But we still need a vision, a strategy, an
army and a commander in the White House who can inspire young and old —
not only to meet that challenge but to see in it the opportunity to make
America a better, stronger and more productive nation. This is our
crucible moment."
I agree. Although Friedman doesn't think the current Democratic
candidates are passionate about the environment, at least the issue will
get much more of a hearing when the White House changes parties next
year. One step at a time, I guess ... :)
Jim
--
Jim Grisanzio http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris
