On Dec 15, 2007 10:24 PM, Chandrachoodan Gopalakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Um, I don't know about the 200 limit being hidden. It was always 200 for > non-pro users. One reason I went pro was I had about 100 new photos to > upload and already had 200 in my stream. > Besides, the 200 limit was originally set by Ludicorp. Y! came in much after > all that. > > C
No..I think the "hidden" part we mean is that we are NOT told about the 200 pic limit when we open the account, but it is sprung on us the hard way.... It is pretty disconcerting to suddenly get a msg that "you have run into one of the limitations of a free account" (and I quoted that.). If I had had prior information when I opened my first Flickr account, I would probably have taken a paid (pro) account; but I was so pissed off with the way they announced it, that I just put in 198 photos and move on...and open another account. Yes, very petty of me...! If Ludicopr made up this rule about 200, then their name makes sense, short for Ludicrous Corporation. btw ....it's fun to watch the features tug-of-war twixt Yahoo and Google...Yahoo Messenger has the stealth setting, Gtalk has it not....Picasa has great offline photo editing features, Flickr has not (even though they recently introduced on-line photo-editing..the geeks on this list probably enjoy this feud with much deeper knowledge than I have! Deepa. > > -- > http://www.flickr.com/photos/ravages > http://www.linkedin.com/in/ravages > http://www.selectiveamnesia.org/ > > +91-9884467463 >
