On Saturday 15 Dec 2007 11:41 pm, Charles Haynes wrote:
> Do you assume the effects must needs be negative?

In fact I have no assumptions. No solutions. Nothing. This whole train of 
discussion was started off by my saying that nobody knows the exact effects, 
good or bad, although the bad tends to work me up me more than any good. I 
was asked to keep spouting opinions and I did just that.

I am guilty of introducing philosophy into what started off as a technical 
issue.

For the past many decades, it has become imperative that every single drug 
used in medicine has to be tested for safety and side effects beyond 
reasonable doubt. That could mean a decade or more before a class of drug 
actually comes into general use. 

We take our personal safety and concern seriously and tend to be less 
concerned about what happens to the environment and there are fewer demands 
for rigorous studies of the impact of any new technology than there are for 
individual human safety. In India the potent anti-inflammatory drug 
Diclofenac has almost become a food item. The virtual extinction of a couple 
of species of vulture in India has been linked to their eating carrion 
treated with Diclofenac before they kicked the bucket.

I personally believe that absurdity sometimes heads the list of 
characteristics that can be attributed to solutions. I tend to have a pile of 
the last 4 or 5 issues of Scientific American (I am a subscriber) to read at 
any given time. This morning I read about an innovative (to say the least) 
solution to reduce deaths in automobile accidents. 

Deaths, it says, are increasingly being caused by disparity in car size as 
manufacturers outdo each other in trying to make smaller and more energy 
efficient cars. Therefore there must be legislation to prevent manufacturers 
from making cars smaller. Keep having accidents. We can't stop road accidents 
(although we can do a better job of preventing airplane crashes.)  But do 
have those accidents in bigger cars with better engine technology and use the 
engine as a buffer between you and the other big car. Brilliant stuff.


shiv


Reply via email to