On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Bonobashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, I think that (building a key to define $ through $$$) is likely to be > hopeless at a top-down level. There are too many diverse contexts on this > list. Maybe the best would be to define only three levels, using the $ sign > only as a signifier of value, and standing for 'very costly', 'valuable' and > 'not expensive', and let everybody decide for herself/himself which activity > is rated what.
Yep, I was thinking of the restaurant guide approach too. Cheeni
