On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:08:54PM +0530, Deepa Mohan wrote: >> >> Yes, yes, please explain. There was a loud zipping noise as this sentence >> shot past over my head.
lol, Deepaaaaa !!!!! I saw black dots before I typed "explain" > > Postbiota are evolutionary successors of us/our machines, living in deep > space as native habitat. They will self-select to create a relativistic > expanding pioneer critter wavefront, that tranforms any stellar system > it passes by. By changing the dead dirt into self it prevents possible > advent of future life (and is difficult to observe, due to relativistic > speed and observer-extinguishing/emergence-preventing side effect (anthropic > principle)). Being darwinian machines these will self-optimize until they > reach ultimate or omega fitness regime at very high diversity, after > which only change is random brownian spatiotemporal fitness oscillations. > > This kinda negates them being stranglers-in-the-crib of protolife and > killers of subexpansive life (as us-current, for instance). In my book. The black dots increased in size :) prompting this question : How is the above related to time (which i defined as destruction) vis-a-vis your idea of an atom or nuclei (assuming postbiota is one or even smaller) 'postbiota' reducing itself to random oscillations. I am wondering how time == 'postbiota' ? -- .
